Modified Comparative Negligence Law in Indiana

Modified Comparative Negligence Law in Indiana

Negligence Laws That Affect Your Indiana Personal Injury Claim

If you’ve been injured and believe someone else’s negligence is to blame in Indiana, understanding the state’s modified comparative negligence law is crucial. This system affects the outcome of personal injury claims, determining the possibility and the amount of compensation you can receive. It’s based on the principle that damages can be divided according to the level of fault of each party in the incident.

Under Indiana’s modified comparative negligence system, you may still obtain recovery for your injuries even if you are partially at fault, as long as your level of responsibility does not exceed 50%. The amount of compensation you can claim will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to you. However, if you are found to be 51% or more at fault, you will be barred from recovering any damages. This framework aims to allocate damages in a way that reflects the shared responsibility of both parties for the incident.

Comparative fault is typical, but does not apply in every situation. For example, claims against government entities fall under contributory negligence. An expert personal injury lawyer can walk you through the intricacies of Indiana’s negligence laws.

You Deserve Expert Legal Representation For Your Case

The law firm of Doehrman Buba Ring provides expert legal representation to clients involved in personal injury cases. Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys has a comprehensive understanding of Indiana’s modified comparative negligence law, and we can help you navigate the complexities of your case and recover compensation. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Understanding Negligence in Indiana

Pure Comparative Negligence

In legal contexts where pure comparative negligence is applied, a plaintiff who is partially at fault can still recover damages. Unlike modified systems, pure comparative negligence allows a party to claim compensation even if they are found to be 99% responsible for an incident. The awarded damages are simply reduced in proportion to the claimant’s degree of fault, ensuring that all parties are held financially accountable only to the extent of their contribution to the accident.

Modified Comparative Negligence: How Indiana’s Law Differs from Pure Comparative Negligence

Indiana’s approach diverges from the pure comparative fault model by placing a cap at 50% fault. As outlined in the state’s modified system, a party’s eligibility for compensation is eliminated entirely if they bear the majority (51% or more) of the responsibility for the incident. This threshold creates a more stringent barrier to recovery and underscores the importance of a thorough and strategic legal evaluation of the case at hand.

Core Principles of the Modified Comparative Fault System

Under the modified comparative negligence 50% bar rule, Indiana sets a specific threshold for the recovery of damages in personal injury cases. This rule is predicated on the concept that a claimant should not be awarded compensation if they are equally responsible, or more so, for the incident compared to the defendant.

The 50% bar operates as a crucial cutoff point in determining compensation eligibility. In essence, if an injured party is found to be 50% or less at fault for their own injuries, they are still entitled to pursue damages, though their compensation will be adjusted to reflect their share of the fault. Once their fault exceeds that 50% line, their right to compensation is forfeited.

How the Percentage of Fault Impacts the Compensation

This system of negligence law ensures that the damage recovery reflects the claimant’s contribution to their own harm. For instance, if you are deemed to be 30% at fault in an accident and your total damages are valued at $100,000, you would be eligible to recover 70% of that amount, which equates to $70,000. The closer a claimant’s fault approaches the 50% mark, the more significantly their potential recovery is reduced. This underscores the necessity of a skilled legal advocate who can vigorously argue for the lowest possible assignment of fault against the injured party in order to maximize their compensation.

How is Fault Determined in a Personal Injury Case? 

Determining fault in a personal injury case is a meticulous process that involves a comparative analysis of the actions of the plaintiff and the defendant. Each party’s actions are scrutinized to assess how much each contributed to the incident. This comparison relies heavily on evidence such as testimonies, physical evidence from the scene, and expert evaluations, which collectively paint a picture of the event.

Courts or juries then assign a percentage of fault to each party based on this evidence. In Indiana, if this percentage reaches or exceeds 51% for a plaintiff, they are barred from recovering any damages. This method of quantifying fault makes the precise collection and presentation of evidence crucial for all parties involved, highlighting the need for accurate and persuasive legal representation.

Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Case

To successfully prove negligence in a personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff must establish four key elements:

Duty of Care: It must be shown that the defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty of care under the circumstances.

Breach of Duty: Evidence must demonstrate that the defendant breached that duty by acting or failing to exercise reasonable care. 

Causation: The plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s actions or lack thereof directly caused the injury.

Damages: Finally, it must be clear that the plaintiff suffered actual damages as a result of the incident, such as physical harm, monetary losses, or emotional distress.

Collecting credible evidence is critical in building a persuasive case. This evidence can range from eyewitness testimony and expert evaluations to documentation like medical records and employment reports reflecting lost wages. A comprehensive legal strategy will harness this evidence to articulate a compelling argument for the defendant’s negligence.

Doehrman Buba Ring Fights For You

At Doehrman Buba Ring, our experienced personal injury attorneys are dedicated to providing strong legal representation for each client. We will meticulously evaluate your case, collect crucial evidence, and build a strategic argument designed to secure the highest possible compensation for your injuries.

We handle a wide range of personal injuries, such as car accident cases, medical malpractice, product liability, and more. Our team of skilled attorneys is dedicated to helping you navigate the complexities of Indiana’s comparative fault system and secure the compensation you deserve for your injuries. Contact us today for a free consultation and take the first step towards getting the justice and financial recovery you are entitled to.

Consult an Experienced Personal Injury Lawyer Indianapolis Residents Have Trusted for Over 50 Years


Hear from Our Clients

Rated 5 out of 5 on Google
More Practice Areas

Need Help In Another Area?

Ready to help you

An Attorney By Your Side Every Step Of The Way

At Doehrman Buba Ring, our Indianapolis attorneys promise personalized attention during every stage of your case. And not just from helpful staff; a partner will always be the one handling your case.

Our Location

Visit our office conveniently located in Indianapolis. We serve clients throughout Indiana, providing them with the legal support they need.


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The submission of a website form does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Unless a formal relationship has been established in writing, the information presented throughout this site, and any response to this web inquiry, either verbal or in writing, should be considered for informational purposes only, and any information provided to the firm should not be viewed as privileged or confidential. Copyright © 2024 All Rights Reserved. Sitemap